MCAT tutoring that starts with why you missed the question
You can know the material and still struggle to use it in an unfamiliar passage. I help you find where the process breaks down, then build a specific plan for what to practice next.
I'm Ezra Menon, MD, MPH, an anesthesiology resident. My MCAT tutoring focuses on content integration, passage reasoning, experimental interpretation, CARS, timing, and useful question review.
Download the free question-review worksheet
Two pages, including an original worked example. No email required.
Start with one question you missed
Before opening the explanation, write down what you thought the question asked and why your answer seemed right. Then find the qualifier, identify the decisive evidence, and locate the first point where your reasoning went off track.
Content: You did not know or understand the needed concept.
Recognition: You knew it but did not recognize when to use it.
Reasoning: You made an unsupported inference or compared the choices incorrectly.
Execution: You had a workable approach but missed a word, unit, calculation, or time decision.
The repair should be something you can do on the next question. "I need to be careful" is too broad to practice. "When a choice claims a mechanism, I will check what the experiment actually measured" gives you a specific habit to test.
Try an original experimental-reasoning example
Researchers treat cultured cells with compound X or a vehicle control. After 30 minutes, X-treated cells have less phosphorylated protein E. Total protein E and cell viability are unchanged. No binding assay is performed.
Which conclusion is most directly supported?
A. Compound X binds directly to protein E.
B. Compound X reduces the total amount of protein E.
C. X-treated cells have less phosphorylated E under the tested conditions.
D. The decrease in phosphorylated E is caused by cell death.
Pause and choose an answer before continuing.
The reasoning
C is the best answer. It stays within the observation and the tested conditions. A adds direct binding, which was not measured. B contradicts unchanged total E. D conflicts with unchanged viability at the measured time.
If you chose A because "phosphorylated E fell, so X must bind E," your review should identify that extra inference. If you did not understand phosphorylated versus total protein, the first repair is a content review. The same wrong answer can have different causes.
Retest: If total E had not been measured, could you conclude that phosphorylation changed independently of protein abundance? No. Lower phosphorylated E alone cannot distinguish reduced phosphorylation from a lower amount of E.
This is an original teaching example, not an official MCAT question.
What we can work on together
We can review how you approach science passages and CARS, interpret figures, use content in context, compare answer choices, and manage time. We can also turn your practice results into a study plan that fits your test date and available time.
Bring your current resources, test date, and a few examples of questions that felt difficult. We'll use your thought process to decide what needs attention first.
Interested in a small-group reasoning clinic?
Send me a note through the contact page and mention "MCAT clinic." This is an expression of interest, not a booking. Dates and availability have not been announced.